Last Sunday, I read Boneshaker by Cherie Priest all in one day. Impressive right? It's not a short book either. 416 pages. And it was full of all sorts of fun stuff. A steampunk vision of a Civil-War era Seattle. Zeppelins. Crazy machines. A gas seeping from underground that makes people into zombies... I mean what more could you possibly want.
But the fact that I read the book in one day makes me suspicious. Did I just unwittingly read a teen novel? Was I fooled by DPL's faulty book organization into reading a book written for high school students? Or did this fun, if a little awkward, book meet its intended audience in my charming readership?
Well, I suppose there must be a way to determine this. First off, it was published by the SyFy conglomerate. So, someone at SyFy thought this was an appropriate story to attract their viewership to the written word. People who watch SyFy are not necessarily a certain age, they just have a certain group of interests. Fair enough, so this is inconclusive.
I guess we want to believe that teen novels should be a little tamer than adult novels... which is not necessarily true. I can bet you that the first sex scene I read was from a "teen novel." I am also pretty sure that there was nothing in this novel that wouldn't be found in an adult novel or a teen novel. There was violent death, there were creepy characters, there were dysfunctional families, and there was evil. The protagonist was a single mother who had to venture into the walled off city of Seattle which was ensconced in a poinsonous gas they called "the Blight." The Blight had been unleashed by her deceased husband by his crazy invention, the Boneshaker. If you breath too much, you die and then sometimes reanimate. They called the zombies "rotters". So the mother goes to rescue the son. The basic structure of the story is "family friendly"; it could easily be made into a Disney film. There is nothing so harsh and cold and evil about the story that I could not end up in the teen book department. Also, no sex. Because there is NOTHING romantic about have to wear a mask at all times to keep the Blight out and there is nothing romantic about have to be quiet so the rotters don't catch wind of you. Nobody was getting it on. Too dangerous, not enough clean air.
If it is considered an regular novel for adults, it's awful tame. I kind of think that it might have done better on the teen market regardless. The only other reason I think it might be a teen novel is because I was able to read it in one day. It was fast; the words were pretty large (they were also printed in dark brown ink instead of black, which I think is cool and show-offish at the same time.) So, I'm pretty much decided that this is a teen novel. It's like a coming of age story for the son, and while he's not the "main" character, he does go through finding out that his father was not blameless when it came to the Blight accident.
Sad day.
My last question is about the picture on the front. Do you think that's the boy, young boys look like girl sometimes? Or the mother, who really shouldn't be that young looking? I can't figure it out. I start to lean towards the mother, but then I'm like it could be the son. Oh bother.
As for whether I liked the book, well I did, but the writing could have been smoother. I felt like I was reading the awkward examples in writing textbooks on how to create believable dialogue. It got better as the book went on. But you can tell this is her first "real" novel. The cover says "break-out novel". I think she should write a sequel, in which the son figures out how to either stop the gas and restore Seattle or tame the rotters and take over Vancouver. Bother are good choices as far as I'm concerned. If you are tired of your paranormal romance, try this steampunk romp on for size, but don't expect to find it challenging. Just sayin'.
The Snarky Women's Guide to Modern Literature
A club of folks who read and review books we loathed, devoured or could not finish.
The reviewers are narcissistic and prone to PMS. You may find inane commentary, sarcastic maneuvering, hostile retorts, some bitch slapping, and lots of vodka induced posts.
Our Motto:
Some people avoid book clubs that behave like soap operas, we buy tickets to them.
P.S. If you don't want spoilers, move along.
The reviewers are narcissistic and prone to PMS. You may find inane commentary, sarcastic maneuvering, hostile retorts, some bitch slapping, and lots of vodka induced posts.
Our Motto:
Some people avoid book clubs that behave like soap operas, we buy tickets to them.
P.S. If you don't want spoilers, move along.
Did I detect some anti-Canadian sentiment in that review?
ReplyDeleteWhat? Where? Oh, attacking Vancouver with zombies? It's bound to happen sometime.
ReplyDelete